Understanding Risk in the Nuclear Science Community
Written on
Chapter 1: Exploring Risk in Nuclear Science
In 2007, I embarked on my journey in the nuclear sector, engaging in various roles from radiation science research to attending scientific conferences. Recently, I had a conversation with fellow nuclear scientist Aneeqa Khan about how we understand and manage risk.
Aneeqa, who specializes in nuclear fusion, spends her time in the lab examining materials to assess their suitability for constructing a nuclear fusion power plant. She emphasizes that risk pertains to potential incidents that could arise during our routine activities. It's crucial to recognize that risk extends beyond the nuclear realm or scientific endeavors; it permeates our daily lives—from simple home repairs to safely navigating busy streets or managing gas pipelines for cooking and heating.
As scientists working primarily in laboratories, we routinely evaluate risks, even in mundane tasks like selecting an office chair. The COVID-19 pandemic heightened the importance of risk assessments, incorporating measures such as social distancing and quarantining packages for 72 hours to ensure safety.
In our everyday lives, we conduct informal risk assessments instinctively. While some risks, like crossing a quiet street, may be deemed acceptable, others—such as traversing a heavily trafficked road—call for additional safety measures, like the installation of pedestrian crossings.
Formal risk assessments, akin to those we perform in the lab, involve analyzing the potential consequences of failures alongside their likelihood. By combining these factors, we can strategize appropriate mitigations to minimize the chances of adverse events occurring.
“This paragraph will result in an indented block of text, typically used for quoting other text.”
Although risk is often associated with physical harm, such as injury or death, it can also pertain to other concerns like health issues or project failures in management contexts.
Section 1.1: Risk and Radiation
When handling radioactive materials, we can mitigate risks through methods such as employing shielding, limiting the quantity of material used, and minimizing exposure time. The specific type and emission rate of radiation dictate our approach. Depending on our risk calculations, we typically implement two safety measures, a strategy known as "defense in depth." This approach ensures that if one safety measure fails, another remains in place as a backup, providing redundancy.
Both Aneeqa and I have engaged in activities that posed risks throughout our lives. Aneeqa recalled an incident from her childhood when she fell from a tree but was fortunate to get caught before hitting the ground. Many of us spent our youth exploring, occasionally reprimanded for taking risks. This interplay between exploration and caution fosters our understanding of risk versus outright danger.
Photo by Ksenia Makagonova on Unsplash
In my professional experience, I’ve observed that public perception often equates nuclear waste with risk, likely because most individuals have no direct interaction with it. This material is kept secured and shielded, which is the safest management method. In the UK, the nuclear sector has accumulated nearly 70 years of expertise in radioactive waste management. The industry’s high standards for safety and its efforts to keep waste away from the public can contribute to a sense of mystery and fear—often articulated as a fear of the unknown. From our perspective, Aneeqa and I appreciate the industry's commitment to safety and transparency.
The primary concern surrounding nuclear energy is radiation—an invisible entity that necessitates caution. A similar analogy can be made with the gas supplied to our homes, which is made detectable by adding a scent. Various sensors can monitor radiation levels, and some materials even emit a glow upon radiation exposure. We ponder whether it would boost public confidence if individuals could wear devices coated with such materials. Nonetheless, background radiation is an omnipresent reality, originating from natural sources like soil, food, and cosmic radiation, prompting us to consider the feasibility of wearable glowing sensors.
Given my extensive international travel, I've likely been exposed to higher levels of cosmic radiation during transatlantic flights than I have in my nuclear-related work. It’s important to focus on the rate of radiation exposure rather than merely the cumulative dose. Typically, I experience a low radiation dose rate, well below the annual allowance set for radiation workers, which includes considerations for medical x-rays and air travel.
Section 1.2: The Value of Risk Assessment
When discussing whether risk assessments hinder our work, both Aneeqa and I concluded that they actually enhance our confidence. Understanding risk equips us with the knowledge to perform tasks safely and responsibly. By quantifying risk through scores, we can evaluate and compare the dangers associated with various activities. One useful concept is the "micromort," which estimates the probability of death from specific activities. Naturally, some actions bear less severe consequences than others.
As nuclear scientists, our approach to risk involves comprehending the potential outcomes of our actions and their likelihood. We also encounter risks in daily life, often feeling more secure when working with radiation due to our understanding of the associated risks and our ability to manage them effectively.
Chapter 2: About This Conversation
This discussion was part of the Technically Speaking podcast, which brings to life the intriguing and sometimes quirky dialogues that scientists and engineers engage in while working in labs. These conversations blend scientific facts, imaginative speculation, and frequent film references. New episodes are available biweekly on platforms like Apple, Spotify, Audible, Google, Podbean, and wherever you listen to podcasts.
To continue the conversation, you can follow the podcast on Twitter.
This video titled "Nuclear Risk Reduction: From Ideas to Action" delves into strategies for minimizing nuclear risks through practical actions and collaborations within the industry.
The video "What's Next for Nuclear Risk Reduction?" explores future directions and initiatives in the field of nuclear safety, emphasizing continued improvement and innovation.