Exploring the Distinction: AI Images vs. Traditional Photography
Written on
Understanding Photography
As a professional photographer specializing in news and travel, I have amassed nearly one million images throughout my career. My portfolio includes a diverse array of subjects—from protests and concerts to intimate family moments and culinary delights. My experience spans various equipment, from high-end Leica cameras to vintage film models from the 1940s.
Recently, a thought-provoking article by the New York Times posed a contentious question: "Are AI images photographs?" My response is a definitive no.
What Defines a Photograph?
Photography involves two essential elements: a technical aspect and a conceptual one. The first element is light. At its core, a photograph captures a specific moment of light that is preserved indefinitely. The term "photography" literally means "drawing with light," which requires a profound sensitivity to the nuances of light.
Light can evoke emotional responses, often subconsciously. For instance, a portrait taken during the golden hour radiates warmth and evokes different feelings compared to one shot under the harsh fluorescent light of an office.
Throughout the history of photography, methods have evolved—from the use of polished metal plates to modern digital sensors—yet the essence remains unchanged. Photography is fundamentally about capturing and preserving real-world light.
The Concept of Pointing
The second critical aspect of photography is conceptual. As curator John Szarkowski articulates, photography is "the act of pointing." This definition resonates deeply with me. In my photography classes, I encourage students to consider the message behind their images. If the answer is merely "Here is something," then the photograph lacks depth.
For example, in food photography, an uninspiring shot may simply present a dish without context or emotion. In contrast, a compelling food photograph might emphasize a key ingredient, the ambiance of the dining environment, or the feelings associated with shared meals.
Ultimately, the artistry of photography lies in the photographer's ability to highlight and convey meaning from the chaos of the real world.
AI Images Fall Short
AI-generated images, however, miss both of these critical elements. Firstly, they do not employ light in a genuine sense; rather, the light in these images is simulated, created by algorithms in a distant server. The creators of these images often have limited control over the lighting, as AI tools like DALL-E or Midjourney determine the lighting based on generated scenes.
For instance, if you request an image of a beautiful person, you are likely to receive an illustration bathed in the soft light of dawn. Conversely, a request for a hacker may yield a figure shrouded in dim, red light.
Moreover, the simulated light in AI images is influenced by the training data, which often consists of vibrant, eye-catching images from social media platforms. One notable project, "Boring America Photorealism" by John Kelly, attempts to use AI to generate mundane images we often capture on our phones, illustrating the challenges involved in achieving realistic, unremarkable results.
With traditional photography, the outcome is determined by real-world lighting conditions. In contrast, AI images are created by designing a subject first and then constructing a surrounding context based on what seems appropriate, rather than highlighting a real-world object or concept.
The Artistic Value of AI Images
So, does this mean AI-generated images lack artistic merit? Not at all. While they are not photographs, they belong to a distinct and equally significant category of art: illustration.
Illustrations transcend the limitations of reality—free from the constraints of physics, available subjects, or moral bounds. Artists can envision any alternate reality and manifest it through their creativity.
This power can be both liberating and perilous. Illustrators often challenge societal norms and political structures through their work, leading to repercussions for their boldness.
AI images, like traditional illustrations, possess the ability to resonate deeply. For instance, AI-generated portrayals of Donald Trump's hypothetical arrest echo a widespread liberal fantasy, while viral images of Pope Francis in a contemporary puffer jacket highlight the clash between tradition and modernity.
The democratizing potential of AI art tools like Midjourney and DALL-E is significant. They enable anyone—regardless of artistic skill—to visualize their ideas, effectively transforming imaginative concepts into visual narratives.
In conclusion, while AI images are not photographs, they serve as powerful illustrations. They challenge our perceptions, reveal societal expectations, and inspire us to envision new realities.
The first video titled "No, AI 'Art' is not Art" delves into the debate surrounding the artistic value of AI-generated images.
The second video titled "Why AI Art is Now Unpopular and Its No Surprise" explores the reasons behind the decline in popularity of AI art.