# Understanding the Need for @Resource and @Autowired in Spring
Written on
Chapter 1: Introduction to Dependency Injection in Spring
In the realm of Spring dependency injection, the annotations “@Resource” and “@Autowired” are often the first to come to mind. While many resources focus solely on the functional differences between these two, they frequently overlook the rationale behind Spring's support for both annotations, which can leave readers with a limited understanding of their use.
Have you ever considered why “@Resource” can operate with both name and type, and why there’s a need for “@Autowired”? Is it merely a matter of Spring having additional resources? Is this really the case? By delving into this article, you'll uncover:
- The origins of the “@Resource” and “@Autowired” annotations
- The reasoning behind Spring's dual support for these annotations
- The yellow warning in IntelliJ IDEA when employing “@Autowired” for property injection
- Recommended practices for utilizing “@Resource” and “@Autowired”
Section 1.1: Origins of the Annotations
To grasp the differences between these annotations, it's essential to first explore their origins.
The “@Resource” annotation was introduced on May 11, 2006, with the JSR 250 specification. Its official description states: “The @Resource annotation designates a resource required by the application. This annotation may be applied to a component class or its fields or methods. When applied to a field or method, the container injects an instance of the specified resource into the application component upon initialization. If applied to a component class, it declares a resource that the application will look up during runtime.” This definition allows for flexible implementation by various components or frameworks.
On the other hand, “@Autowired” made its debut with Spring 2.5 on November 19, 2007. The official description for “@Autowired” states: “Marks a constructor, field, setter method, or configuration method for autowiring by Spring’s dependency injection capabilities.” It appears that “@Autowired” is Spring's preferred method while “@Resource” serves as a standard implementation.
So, what prompts Spring to support both “@Resource” and its own “@Autowired”?
A review of the Spring 2.5 documentation reveals that it acknowledges the limitations of “@Resource” and thus introduces “@Autowired” to enhance control over dependency injection.
Section 1.2: Differences in Functionality
The key distinction lies in their injection methodologies. While “@Autowired” is primarily used for type-based injection, “@Resource” is more focused on name-based injection, reverting to type matching only if no name is found.
In terms of functional granularity, “@Resource” encompasses the capabilities of “@Autowired.” As detailed in the Spring 2.5 documentation, “@Resource” is designed to locate a specific resource by name, whereas “@Autowired” aims to connect suitable components based on type.
Spring's support for both annotations stems from their differing focuses. “@Resource” aligns with the JSR-250 standard, which is compatible with other frameworks, while “@Autowired” offers a Spring-centric approach.
Chapter 2: Practical Considerations
In this video, we explore the Spring annotations in detail, discussing their usage and best practices.
This video clarifies the differences between @Autowired and @Resource, providing insights into when to use each.
Section 2.1: Handling Warnings in IntelliJ IDEA
A notable detail that may have caught your attention is the yellow warning in IntelliJ IDEA when using “@Autowired” for properties. This warning suggests a preference for constructor injection over property-based injection.
The reasoning for this recommendation is detailed in the Spring documentation and includes:
- Constant Properties: Property-based dependency injection cannot be used for final fields, as they need to be instantiated during class creation. Constructor injection is the only method for immutable dependencies.
- Single Responsibility Principle: A class should ideally focus on a singular aspect of application functionality. Excessive dependencies can obscure this responsibility, whereas constructor injection highlights potential issues by making the constructor more complex.
- Circular Dependencies: If two classes depend on each other for injection, using constructor injection will expose this circular dependency more readily.
- Spring Container Dependency: Classes with properties annotated with “@Autowired” require the Spring container for instantiation, complicating unit testing.
Section 2.2: Why No Warning for @Resource?
The absence of a warning for “@Resource” may stem from its adherence to the JSR-250 standard, which ensures compatibility across various IoC frameworks. This makes “@Resource” more versatile even when switching containers.
Section 2.3: Best Practices for Usage
When deciding between these annotations, remember that “@Resource” is typically used for injecting a specific resource, while “@Autowired” matches all suitable resources by type.
Although collection injection is possible with “@Resource,” it’s generally advisable to utilize “@Autowired.” This is evident from the small green icon in IntelliJ, indicating that collection injection with “@Resource” is discouraged.
Recommended Usage for @Autowired:
- Constructor Method:
- Setter Method:
In conclusion, I hope this article sheds light on the distinctions and appropriate uses of “@Resource” and “@Autowired.”
I am a backend software engineer. If you're interested in technology, feel free to follow my channel for updates on my daily work and inspirations.
Get Connected:
My LinkedIn
Read More:
- 5 Pieces of Advice I Wish I Had Known in College Days
- My Favorite 5 IntelliJ Plugins That Can Boost Your Productivity
- 10 Best Software Engineering Practices for Java