Maskers vs. Anti-Maskers

At this juncture, it is imperative to acknowledge the reality of the situation. The ongoing conflict can largely be characterized as a divide between maskers, who wear masks to protect themselves and others, and anti-maskers, who perceive mask-wearing as an infringement on their liberties.

Anti-maskers treat scientific evidence as optional, rejecting established research. While this is disheartening, it is important to recognize that their beliefs are influenced by a multitude of conspiracy theories that have proliferated during the pandemic. The internet has seen an influx of conflicting information, with many individuals opting to rely on YouTube videos that present dubious claims rather than seeking out credible sources.

"Recently, scientists have expressed concern over Trump's endorsement of fringe beliefs and unsupported theories. The current worry is no longer just the influence of profit-driven lobbyists, but also the rise of conspiracy theorists" (Milman, 2020).

Trump has promoted several controversial theories regarding COVID-19. Initially, he downplayed the virus's significance in the United States and later assembled a task force, only to largely ignore their guidance. At one point, he even suggested that scientists explore the possibility of using disinfectants as a treatment inside the body. This may sound ludicrous, yet conspiracy theorists often claim his statements have been misrepresented. However, his remarks were unequivocal.

"William Bryan, acting head of the US Department of Homeland Security's Science and Technology Directorate, presented findings at a press conference. While cautioning that the research should be approached with skepticism, Mr. Trump suggested further exploration in that domain. 'Supposing we hit the body with a tremendous — whether it's ultraviolet or just very powerful light,' the president posited, turning to Dr. Deborah Birx, the White House coronavirus response coordinator, 'and I think you said that hasn't been checked but you're going to test it. And then I said, supposing you brought the light inside of the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way. Sounds interesting,' he continued" (Coronavirus, BBC, 2020).

Despite assertions from Trump administration officials that his comments were taken out of context, they reflect a chaotic lack of clarity within the chain of command. The federal government has not implemented a coherent, enforceable policy or provided states with necessary PPE. Instead of disseminating vital information about COVID-19, conspiracy theories have gained traction. Until recently, Trump himself refused to wear a mask and often framed mask-wearing as a personal choice.

Scientists globally have been baffled by America's response to the pandemic for all the wrong reasons.

"They have exceeded my imagination with their scientific denial," remarked Gretchen Goldman, research director at the Union of Concerned Scientists. "Previous administrations at least gave the impression of valuing scientific evidence and placing qualified individuals in positions of authority. This administration, however, clearly does not prioritize such values, fundamentally altering the landscape" (Milman, 2020).

It is crucial for Americans to heed the warnings from career scientists regarding the mismanagement of this crisis. If attention is not paid, the death toll will continue to rise. Reflect on whether you have lost someone to this virus. What measures would you be willing to take to prevent further loss? That is precisely what needs to be done.

Many individuals long for a return to normalcy, and that desire is understandable. We can all think of valid reasons to don real clothes and step outside. Various experiences and environments are beneficial for mental health. The effects of isolation differ from person to person. Psychologists are currently providing guidance to address mental health challenges. Parents and educators are eager for children to return to school. Whether schools will be perceived as safe by parents, students, and educators has sparked a national debate that remains unresolved.

However, it is vital not to allow reasonable arguments for reopening to lead one down the anti-masker path. The distinction between a desire to reopen and the necessity for safe reopening may seem subtle, yet it could mean the difference between life and death for many Americans.

"Do you oppose wearing a mask because it infringes upon your rights? Consider that you are also infringing upon my right to access public spaces free from the risk of COVID-19 transmission" (Board, 2020).

As we reflect on the pressing challenges facing Americans in 2020, including a global pandemic that has reshaped our interactions, the reckoning with systemic racism, and a pivotal presidential election, how we confront these issues will influence the America of tomorrow.